Gun Rights Consequences of Marijuana Legalization
(Is the Second Amendment going up in smoke?)
What does “Legal” and Medical Marijuana law do to gun rights, you asked?
The short answer is that the Feds won’t allow a dealer to sell a pot-card holder a gun, and they should not possess one.
Florida and some other states have decided to legalize low-dose marijuana/THC for medical treatment or personal use. Many states have even amended the their constitutions to allow it. However, a “legal” user is not allowed to purchase a firearm. Wilson V. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir. 2016). Ms. Wilson was a “legal” marijuana prescription card holder in Nevada. She sued because a Federal Firearms Licensees Dealer (FFL) would not sell her a firearm, pursuant to directions from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). In September, 2011, the ATF directed all Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) “that regardless of whether his or her State has passed legislation authorizing marijuana for medical purposes, a person is an unlawful user and is prohibited by Federal law from possessing firearms or ammunition.” Any potential purchaser is required to answer that they are such a person on ATF Form 4473, question 11.e.
The court’s ruling said Wilson’s right to bear arms under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution had been infringed, but that the government had a right to infringe upon it. Marijuana is still classified as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 812. A Schedule I controlled substance is deemed to have “no currently accepted medical use in treatment…and…a lack of accepted safety for use of the … substance under medical supervision.” Id. § 812(b)(1)(B) & (c). Federal law outlaws possession of a firearm by “unlawful user” of, or by a person addicted to any controlled substance, to possess a firearm (Title 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(3)). The penalty is the same as for a convicted felon possessing a firearm, a maximum of 10 years in prison.
The United States Supreme Court declined to accept the Wilson ruling for review making this the law. (137 S.Ct. 1396 (2017)). The Wilson case did not specifically address if it was legal to possession of a weapon by a pot card holder, because there was no showing that Wilson actually had a firearm. The US Supreme Court previously allowed a medical marijuana card holder to possess a firearm and a concealed weapons permit by declining to hear a case from Oregon. There, Jackson County, Oregon, Sheriff Mike Winter refused to issue a concealed gun permit to admitted marijuana user. She appealed that decision and was issued a concealed weapon permit by the state appeals and Oregon Supreme Court. The Sheriff’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court was denied, making the Oregon ruling law at that point. (132 S.Ct.199(2012)) But it appears the Wilson decision is controlling, so do not possess a firearm if you have a pot card.
This possession issue will certainly be brought before the court again with more states legalizing marijuana in some form. My advice, after 25+ years as a criminal defense lawyer is to not mess with the feds. You do not want to be the person before the United States Supreme Court five years from now. So choose between your pot or your gun.
“Stay out of trouble. But if you don’t, call me.”
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely on an advertisement. You have the right to request free written information about the education, experience, and qualifications of any of our attorneys before hiring them. No attorney-client relationship exists prior to the execution of an attorney-client contract.